Presidential Threshold Polemic in the 2019 Election and Before the 2024 Election Contest in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30652/3nwzfg75Keywords:
Polemic, Presidential Threshold, ElectionAbstract
The application of the presidential threshold in the presidential nomination election in Indonesia gave rise to various controversies and became a topic of discussion in the country's political system. This research wants to see the presidential threshold polemic in the 2019 election and before the 2024 election contestation in Indonesia. The type of research used is normative legal research. The findings in the 2019 election of the presidential threshold polemic that occurred were a number of political parties objecting to a high threshold, restrictions on the freedom of the people/the best sons and daughters who wanted to advance in the presidential election, the public were given choices that were not varied, weakened the presidential system and contradicted the 1945 Constitution Then the polemic leading up to the 2024 election, namely: elite candidates dominating, alternative candidates are limited, consideration of the Constitutional Court is problematic, article 222 of the law is contrary to article 6A (2) of the 1945 Constitution and democratic space is now limited.
References
Anggara, Vanni. “Dinamika Presidential Threshold Dalam Sistem Presidensial Di Indonesia”. Jurnal Transformative 5, no. 2 (September 2019).
Ansor, Lutfil. “Aturan Presidential Threshold Dinilai Batasi Jumlah Calon Presiden”. https://www.mkri.id/, 2022.
___________. “Telaah Terhadap Presidential Threshold Dalam Pemilu Serentak 2019”. Jurnal Yuridis 4, no. 1 (2016).
Arfana, Nano Tresna. “Permohonan Uji ‘Presidential Threshold’ Dua Anggota DPD Tidak Dapat Diterima”. https://www.mkri.id/, 2022.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Gagasan Kedaulatan Rakyat Dalam Konstitusi Dan Pelaksanaannya Di Indonesia: Pergeseran Keseimbangan Antara Individualisme Dan Kolektivisme Dalam Kebijakan Demokrasi Politik Dan Demokrasi Ekonomi Selama Tiga Masa Demokrasi, 1945-1980-An. Jakarta: Ichtiar Baru van Hoeve, 1993.
Baskoro, Aji. “Presidential Threshold Di Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Maslahah Mursalah”. Legislatif 2, no. 2 (2019)
Diniyanto, A. “Mengukur Dampak Penerapan Presidential Threshold Di Pemilu Serentak Tahun 2019”. Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev) 1, no. 1 (2018)
Fauzi. “Ketua DPD: Empat Dampak Negatif ‘Presidential Threshold’ UU Pemilu”.
https://www.antaranews.com/, 2021.
Fuady, Munir. Teori Negara Hukum Modern (Rechttstat). Bandung: Rafika Aditama, 2011.
Ghoffar, Abdul. “Problematika Presidential Threshold: Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Pengalaman Di Negara Lain”. Jurnal Konstitusi 15, no. 3 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1532.
M Daffa Alfaritsi, and Yoga Mulyadi. “Permasalahan Mengenai Pemilihan Umum Tentang Efektivitas Ambang Batas Presiden”. Jurnal Rechten : Riset Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia 2, no. 3 (2022) https://doi.org/10.52005/rechten.v2i3.63.
MD, Moh. Mahfud. Politik Hukum Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2017.
Sodikin. “Pemilu Serentak (Pemilu Legislatif Dengan Pemilu Presiden Dan Wakil Presiden) Dan Penguatan Sistem Presidensial,.’” Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 3, no. 1 (2014).
Triwulan, Titik. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia Pascaamandemen UUD 1945. Jakarta: Cerdas Pustaka Publisher, 2008.
Wicaksana, Arif. “Problematika Konstitusionalitas Presidential Threshold Di Indonesia”. Jurnal Hukum Positum 7, no. 1 (2016).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ahmad Shirotol, Mhd. Erwin Munthe, Ridwan Harahap, Alfi Hasanah (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license allows others to share, adapt, and build upon your work, but only for non-commercial purposes and under the same license terms. Specifically, it requires attribution to the original creator, prohibits commercial use, and mandates that any derivative works are also shared under the same CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
