Judge's Dilemma in Determining Bankruptcy Decisions: Dichotomy Between Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 3 of 2023 and Law 37 of 2004 Concerning Bankruptcy- PKPU
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30652/j18mj114Keywords:
Bankruptcy , Supreme Court, PKPUAbstract
This study aims to examine the dilemma faced by judges in determining bankruptcy decisions, especially in the context of conflict between Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 3 of 2023 and Law 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy-PKPU. The research method used is a normative research method that focuses on analyzing laws and regulations, court decisions, and related legal documents. This approach allows researchers to understand and analyze relevant legal aspects to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the judge's dilemma in determining bankruptcy decisions. In the context of normative research, the researcher conducted an in-depth study of the conflict between Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 3 Year 2023 and Law 37 Year 2004 on Bankruptcy-PKPU. This research explores how judges face the challenge of applying different regulations and their potential impact on their decisions. The analysis is conducted with reference to applicable legal principles, legal interpretations, as well as relevant cases in court practice. The results of this study are expected to contribute to clarifying the framework of thought and legal solutions to the problem of judges' dilemma in the context of bankruptcy in Indonesia. In addition, this research can also serve as a basis for stakeholders, both legal practitioners and policy makers, to consider the necessary steps to minimize legal conflicts and improve consistency and fairness in handling bankruptcy cases.
References
Abdullah, Mahadi, et al. “Analisis Perkawinan Beda Agama Di Kota Semarang: Sebuah Telaah Setelah Dikeluarkannya SEMA Nomor 2 Tahun 2023”. Jurnal Hukum Dan Kewarganegaraan 1, no. 4 (2023).
Anggono, Bayu Dwi. “Tertib Jenis, Hierarki, Dan Materi Muatan Peraturan Perundang- Undangan: Permasalahan Dan Solusinya”. Masalah-Masalah Hukum 47, no. 1 (January 30, 2018). https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.47.1.2018.1-9.
Ardiansyah, Mohammad Kamil. “Pembaruan Hukum oleh Mahkamah Agung dalam Mengisi Kekosongan Hukum Acara Perdata di Indonesia”. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum 14, no. 2 (July 24, 2020): 361-384. https://doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2020.V14.361-384.
Ashiddiqie, Jimly dan Ali Safa’at. Teori Hans Kelsen Tentang Hukum. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI, 2006.
Doerfler Ryan D. and Samuel Moyn. “Democratizing the Supreme Court”. California Law Review 109, (2021): 1705–1771. https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38TX3571X.
Efendi, Jonaedi, and Johnny Ibrahim. Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Empiris. Depok: Kencana, 2018.
Fatah, M. Afif Gusti. “Kedudukan SEMA Sebagai Dasar Hukum Pertimbangan Hakim”. Jurnal Transparansi Hukum 7, no. 1 (2024).
HS, Salim, dan Erlies Septiana Nurbaini. Penerapan Teori Hukum Pada Penelitian Disertasi Dan Tesis Buku Kedua. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2017.
Iswahyuni, Ari. “Kedudukan Ancaman Pidana Minimal Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika Pasca Dikeluarkannya Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2015”. Jurnal Panorama Hukum 3, no. 1 (July 5, 2018). https://doi.org/10.21067/jph.v3i1.2321.
Kharisma, Bintang Ulya. “Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung 9SEMA) Nomor 2 Tahun 2023, Akhir Dari Polemik Perkawinan Beda Agama?”. Journal of Scientech Research and Development 5, no. 1 (June 29, 2023). https://doi.org/10.56670/jsrd.v5i1.164.
Mangara, Gerhard, dan Tazqia Aulia Al-Djufri. “Urgensi Pembaharuan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata di Indonesia”. Rewang Rencang : Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 3, no. 4 (2022).
Muhaimim. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram: Mataram University Press, 2020.
Putra, Hendra Catur. “Kedudukan SEMA Dalam Sistem Hierarki Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia”. ELQONUN: Jurnal Hukum Ketatanegaraan 1, no. 2 (2022).
Santoso, Raihan Andhika, Elan Jaelani, and Utang Rosidin. “Kedudukan dan Kekuatan Hukum Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung (Sema) Dalam Hukum Positif Indonesia”. Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 4 (October 9, 2023).
https://doi.org/10.59581/deposisi.v1i4.1392.
Saragih, Geofani Milthree. “Pancasila Sebagai Landasan Filosofis Pembentukan Peraturan
Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia”. JUPANK (Jurnal Pancasila dan
Kewarganegaraan) 2, no. 1 (2022).
Situmeang, Tomson “Reposisi Pengadilan Pajak Menurut Sistem Kekuasaan Kehakiman Di
Indonesia”. Honeste Vivere 32, no. 2 (June 27, 2022): 108–122.
https://doi.org/10.55809/hv.v32i2.138.
Situmorang, Fernando, Ramlani Lina Sinaulan, dan Mohamad Ismed. “Kajian Hukum Tentang
Kedudukan SEMA Nomor 1 Tahun 2022 Atas Undang-Undang Kepailitan Nomor 37
Tahun 2004”. Jurnal Perspektif 22, no. 2 (2023).
Soeprapto, Maria Farida Indrati. Ilmu Perundang-Undangan, Dasar-Dasar dan
Pembentukannya. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2006.
Wątor, Monika Florczak. Judicial Law-Making in European Constitutional Courts. 1st ed.
London: Routledge, 2020. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003022442.
Witanto, Darmoko Yuti dan Arya Negara Kutarawingin Putra. Diskresi Hakim. Jakarta: Alfabeta, 2013.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 M.O. Saut Hamonangan Turnip, Geofani Milthree Saragih, Evanto Pandora Manalu (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license allows others to share, adapt, and build upon your work, but only for non-commercial purposes and under the same license terms. Specifically, it requires attribution to the original creator, prohibits commercial use, and mandates that any derivative works are also shared under the same CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
