Problematika Hukum dalam Penerapan Pasal 109 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 130/PUU-XIII/2015 Ditinjau dari Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Pekanbaru Nomor: 27/Pid.Prap/2017/PN.PBR

Revendra. M

Abstract


The legal problem in the application of Article 109 paragraph (1) of the CPC is: the absence of legal sanctions for investigators which does not inform the commencement of the investigation of an incident which is a criminal offense to the prosecutor, the reporter and the victim/complainant; the occurrence of extension to things that become the object of pre-trial; lack of legal protection against the reporter/victim; the absence of the principle of legal fiction by investigators; and not yet optimal method of investigation. The ideal concept of law in the application of Article 109 paragraph (1) CPC is: the existence of legal sanctions for investigators who do not inform the commencement of an investigation of an incident which is a criminal offense to the prosecutor, the reporter and the victim/complainant; the existence of special rules regarding pre-trial object boundaries; optimal and genuine role of the state in providing legal protection to the reporter/victim; law enforcers in the implementation of their main duties and functions shall apply the principles of legal fiction; and changes to the method of investigation so that there is no gap for the suspect to use pretrial facilities in an effort to escape from the law.

 


Keywords


Constitutional Court, Pretrial, Article 109 paragraph (1) CPC

Full Text:

PDF


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30652/ml.v2i1.5360

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Melayunesia Law

Melayunesia Law has been indexed by:


Melayunesia Law is an open access under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC-BY-SA license)