Application of Customary Sanctions in the Settlement of Criminal Cases in the Malay Community of Indragiri Hilir, Riau

Ferawati Ferawati, Hengki Firmanda, Elmayanti Elmayanti

Abstract


Settlement of cases through formal justice and using positive law has a weakness because the orientation in punishment is more focused on the perpetrator (Offender oriented) so that the suffering or loss of the victim is ignored, in addition to the procedure for resolving criminal acts through criminal law, it is not possible for victims to participate actively determine how the conflict will be resolved. even the attitudes and actions of law enforcement officers often cause other suffering for victims (secondary victimization). To overcome these problems, the idea arose to reimpose the settlement of criminal cases using customary law, in line with this idea, this study aims to explore the valuesof local wisdom (customary law) with Indragiri Hilir which are still used to resolve criminal cases that occur in the community, the type of research carried out is normative-empirical legal research (applied law research). but more importantly useful and beneficial for the recovery of suffering or loss of victims.

Keywords


Customary Law; Malay; Ciminal Cases

Full Text:

PDF

References


Airil Safrijal, “Penerapan Sanksi Adat dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana”, Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum , No.59, Tahun XV, April (2013)

Angkasa, “Over capacity Narapidana di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan, Faktor Penyebab, Implikasi Negatif, serta Solusi dalam Upaya Optimalisasi Pembinaan Narapidana”, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum , Vol. 10 No. 3, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jenderal Soedirman Purwokerto, (2010)

Effendi, Erdianto, Hukum Pidana Adat, Gagasan Pluralisme dalam Hukum Pidana dan Penerapan Hukum Menurut Keyakinan Hukum, Bandung: PT Refika Aditama, 2018

Ferawati and Dasrol, “Mediasi Penal Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Pada Masyarakat Desa Tanjung Alai Kecamatan XIII Koto Kampar, Riau “, Melayunesia Law Journal, Volume 2 Nomor 1, (Desember 2018)

Joel Waldfoger, Are Fines and Prison Terms Used Efficiently? Evidence on Federal Fraud Offenders,” Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 35,April (1995)

Kuat Puji Prayitno, Restorative Justice Untuk Peradilan di Indonesia (Persspektif Yuridis Filosofis dalam Penegakan Hukum In Concreto).”Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto, hal .409.Vol 12 No.3, (2012)

Marcus J. Pattinama, “Pergentasan Kemiskinan dengan Kearifan Lokal, Jurnal Makara Sosial Humaniora Vol.13 No. 1, Juli 2009, (1-12)

Muhar Junef, Penerapan Sanksi Adat Kepada perusahaan dan Pihak lain dalam peradilan Adat, Journal Widya Yustisia, Vol. I Nomor 2 Februari (2015)

Muladi, Barda Nawawi Arief, Teori-teori dan kebijakan Pidana, Alumni, Bandung: Alumni, 1992

Rahardjo, Satjipto, Hukum dan Masyarakat, Bandung: Angkasa, 1980

Satjipto Rahardjo, “hukum Progesif, kesinambungan, merobohkan dan membangun,” Jurnal Hukum Progresif ,Vol. 2 No. 1, Program DOktor Ilmu Hukum Universitas Diponegoro Semarang, April (2016)

Steven D Leviit, “ Incentive Compatibility Constraints as an Explanation for the Use of Prison Sentence Instead of fines”, International Review of Law and Economics, vol. 17 (1997)

Wandi, Eksistensi Pengakuan Hukum Adat dalam Politik Pembangunan Hukum Pemerintahan Daerah di Indonesia, Jurnal Mahkamah, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Riau Vol.5 No. 1,(2013)

Widiartana, G, Victimologi Perspektif korban dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan, Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka, 2014




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30652/ml.v5i1.7826

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Ferawati Ferawati, Hengki Firmanda, Elmayanti Elmayanti

Melayunesia Law has been indexed by:


Melayunesia Law is an open access under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC-BY-NC License)