Presidential Threshold Polemic in the 2019 Election and Before the 2024 Election Contest in Indonesia
Abstract
The application of the presidential threshold in the presidential nomination election in Indonesia gave rise to various controversies and became a topic of discussion in the country's political system. This research wants to see the presidential threshold polemic in the 2019 election and before the 2024 election contestation in Indonesia. The type of research used is normative legal research. The findings in the 2019 election of the presidential threshold polemic that occurred were a number of political parties objecting to a high threshold, restrictions on the freedom of the people/the best sons and daughters who wanted to advance in the presidential election, the public were given choices that were not varied, weakened the presidential system and contradicted the 1945 Constitution Then the polemic leading up to the 2024 election, namely: elite candidates dominating, alternative candidates are limited, consideration of the Constitutional Court is problematic, article 222 of the law is contrary to article 6A (2) of the 1945 Constitution and democratic space is now limited.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
A, L. “Aturan Presidential Threshold Dinilai Batasi Jumlah Calon Presiden.” https://www.mkri.id/, 2022. https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=17959.
Aji Baskoro. “Presidential Threshold Di Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Maslahah Mursalah.” Legislatif 2, no. 2 (2019): 47. https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/jhl/article/view/10218.
Anggara, Vanni. “Dinamika Presidential Threshold Dalam Sistem Presidensial Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Transformative 5, no. September (2019): 17–36.
Ansor, Lutfil. “Telaah Terhadap Presidential Threshold Dalam Pemilu Serentak 2019.” Jurnal Yuridis 4, no. 1 (2016): 15–27.
Arfana, Nano Tresna. “Permohonan Uji ‘Presidential Threshold’ Dua Anggota DPD Tidak Dapat Diterima.” https://www.mkri.id/, 2022. https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=18012&menu=2#:~:text=Sebelumnya%2C para Pemohon mengujikan Pasal,puluh lima persen) dari suara.
Diniyanto, A. “Mengukur Dampak Penerapan Presidential Threshold Di Pemilu Serentak Tahun 2019.” Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev) 1, no. 1 (2018): 87–88. https://doi.org/10.15294/islrev.v1i1.26941.
Fauzi. “Ketua DPD: Empat Dampak Negatif ‘Presidential Threshold’ UU Pemilu.” https://www.antaranews.com/, 2021. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/2256170/ketua-dpd-empat-dampak-negatif-presidential-threshold-uu-pemilu.
———. “Ketua DPD: Empat Dampak Negatif ‘Presidential Threshold’ UU Pemilu.” https://www.antaranews.com/, 2021. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/2256170/ketua-dpd-empat-dampak-negatif-presidential-threshold-uu-pemilu.
Ghoffar, Abdul. “Problematika Presidential Threshold: Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Pengalaman Di Negara Lain.” Jurnal Konstitusi 15, no. 3 (2018): 480. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1532.
M Daffa Alfaritsi, and Yoga Mulyadi. “Permasalahan Mengenai Pemilihan Umum Tentang Efektivitas Ambang Batas Presiden.” Jurnal Rechten : Riset Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia 2, no. 3 (2022): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.52005/rechten.v2i3.63.
Rofi Ali Majid. “Arti Presidential Threshold 20%, Mekanisme Pengajuan Capres & Cawapres, Siapa Partai Terkuat?” https://www.kompas.tv/, 2022. https://www.kompas.tv/nasional/329743/arti-presidential-threshold-20-mekanisme-pengajuan-capres-cawapres-siapa-partai-terkuat.
Wicaksana, Arif. “Problematika Konstitusionalitas Presidential Threshold Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Positum 7, no. 1 (2016): 1–24.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30652/ml.v7i2.8003
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Ahmad Ahmad Shirotol
Melayunesia Law has been indexed by:
|
