Analysis of Article 69 of Law Number 8 of 2010 concerning Prevention and Eradication of the Crime of Money Laundering in the Perspective of Legal Certainty
Abstract
The problem that has been an obstacle for the prosecutor's office to enforce money laundering offenses is the evidence which constitutes "multiple and related offenses", which means that the offense will not exist if there are no other offenses as the origin of the offense. Article 2 of Law Number 8 of 2010 has stated the types of predicated crimes in money laundering. The crime of money laundering is included in the qualification of a special crime, not a general crime. A general crime is a crime regulated in the Criminal Code (hereinafter abbreviated to the Criminal Code) and is an act of a general nature, Type ResearchThis research uses normative legal research. Researchers found The analysis of Article 69 of Law No. 8 of 2010 concerning the prevention and eradication of the crime of money laundering in the perspective of legal certainty is debatable because Article 69 does not need to have a proven main crime to prosecute and criminalize the perpetrators. Ideally, evidence in handling cases of money laundering in conducting investigations, prosecutions, and examinations in court is not required to prove the original crime.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Garnasih, Yenti. Anti-Money Laundering Law Enforcement and Its Problems in Indonesia, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2015.
Amrani, Hanafi. Criminal Law of Money Laundering, Development of the Anti-Money Laundering Regime and Its Implications for the Basic Principles of State Sovereignty, Criminal Jurisdiction and Law Enforcement, Yogyakarta: UUI Press, 2015.
Investigations in Indonesia consist of the Indonesian National Police, the Attorney General's Office, the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), the National Narcotics Agency (BNN), as well as the Directorate of Taxes and the Directorate General of Customs and Excise, Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia.
Kristiana,Yadi. Eradication of the Crime of Money Laundering from a Progressive Legal Perspective, Yogyakarta: Thafa Media, 2015.
Ramelan, Reda Mantovani, dan Paulie David. Panduan Untuk Jaksa Penuntut Umum Indonesia dalam Penanganan Harta Perolehan Hasil Kejahatan Jakarta: Indonesia-Australia Legal Developmen Facility, 2008.
R. Wiyono SH, Discussion on the Law on the Prevention and Eradication of the Crime of Money Laundering, Jakarta: Sinar Graphic, 2013.
Atmasista, Romli. “Legal Analysis of Law Number 8 of 2010 concerning Prevention and Eradication of the Crime of Money Laundering”, Journal of Legal Studies 3, No. 1 (2016): 18.
the Draft Law on Prevention and Eradication of the Crime of Money Laundering with Experts,.
Rahmi Triani Uzier & Bimo Prasetio, 2017. Can Criminalization Happen Using the Money Laundering Law Because There is No Need for Proof of Predicate Crime?, accessed through the website https://bplawyers.co.id/2017/03/13/perhaps-terjadi-criminalisasi-using-uu-penwashing-uang-karena-no-perlu-ada-pemunjukan-tindak-pidana-asal/, on November 17, 2020.
https://www. Hukumonline.com/berita/baca/hol22301/tindak-pidana-pencepatan-uang-bisa-berdiri-diri?page=2
Experts presented by the Constitutional Court, Law Experts at Diponegoro University, Nyoman United Putra Jaya and experts presented by the Related Party, Komariah, will present their expertise in the judicial review of the Money Laundering Law (TPPU), Monday (19/10) in the Plenary Session Room of the Constitutional Court Building.
Agus Sahbani, 2015. Former Kapuspenkum AGO sues the Money Laundering Law, accessed through the website https://www. Hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt55d2d2ea46ae9/mantan-kapuspenkum-/, on November 15, 2020
Experts presented by the Constitutional Court, Law Experts at Diponegoro University, Nyoman United Putra Jaya and experts presented by the Related Party, Komariah, will present their expertise in the judicial review of the Money Laundering Law (TPPU), Monday (19/10) in the Plenary Session Room of the Constitutional Court Building, accessed via https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web. News&id=12295, on December 30, 2020
Ramlan, Ajie. “Effect of Constitutional Court Decision No. 77 / Puu-Xii/ 2014 Against Money Laundering Eradication Comparison of Indonesia With Three Other Countries”, Dejure Legal Research Journal 17, No.4 (2017): 339.
Rahmadan, Davit. Law Enforcement Against Perpetrators in the Regime of Money Laundering in Indonesia. Dissertation, Andalas University (2018).
Decision 584/Pid.B/2013/PN.DPK
Muslim, Fitriadi and Nasution, Edi, “Snacking Corruptors with Money Laundering”, Legal Journal (2018): 18.
R. Wiyono, Discussion on the Law on the Prevention and Eradication of the Crime of Money Laundering, printing 1, East Jakarta: Sinar Graphic, 2014.
https://www.kejaksaan.go.id/pidato.php?idu=1&id=14
Understanding, Factors, and Characters of White Collar Crime. http://material Hukum.com/2018/ 05/30/pengertian-factor-dan-character-white-collar-crime/. Uploaded 30 May 2018. Retrieved 21 May 2021.
Sukanto, Soerjono. Factors Affecting Law Enforcement. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2005.
Agus Sahbani. Former Kapuspenkum AGO sues the Money Laundering Law, accessed through the website https://www. Hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt55d2d2ea46ae9/mantan-kapuspenkum-/, on November 15, 2020
Soedarto, Criminal Law Reform in Indonesia, Jakarta: Binacipta, 1986.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30652/ml.v6i1.7811
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 iwan Roy Charles
Melayunesia Law has been indexed by:
|
